NotAIDS! Commentary
April 12, 2007

A recent study in South Africa shows that exclusive breastfeeding actually inhibits HIV "transmission". The rate of HIV occurence in infants fed formula and other foods in addition to breast milk is actually 11 times higher.

Forget for a moment that HIV transmission to newborns is a ludicrous concept - due to hormonal changes and natural antibody and other lymphocyte responses to pregnancy, most pregnant women will test HIV positive. So will baby, who will change to negative without any drugs in the first couple of years of life.

Yet, women have been targeted by world policy peddlers at the World Health Organization (WHO) for many years as they have tried to do away with breastfeeding using the imagined fear of HIV transmission. Alas, why aren't the WHO and UNAIDS organizations rushing to recommnend that women everywhere breastfeed their infants?

Maybe it's because they are too busy implementing ill-conceived plans to circumcise millions of men around the world, including Africa, and now, New York City.

Non-sterile surgical equipment and inadequate supplies of anesthetics in many regions are just two reasons this mad plan will be a disaster. Another problem with this twisted WHO/UNAIDS circumcision brainchild is that the foreskin provides important protection against sexually transmitted infections (STIs or STDs).

Furthermore, it is highly likely that men everywhere won't wait the weeks required for their wounds to completely heal. Consequently, tears in the delicate skin of the penis where the foreskin was removed will enable super-efficient vectors for the absorption of bacteria during sex.

The foreskin provides natural protection against bacteria and contains millions of nerve endings which makes sex apparently too enjoyable. If the circumcision campaign succeeds, the targeted populations will see an exponential spike in sexually transmitted infections and urinary tract infections.

It is increasingly obvious that masochists at WHO and UNAIDS are hell-bent on meddling where they have no bona fide business and intent on wreaking havoc on every continent. Already the world is fooled by their asinine and deadly policy of giving AZT, Nevaripine, and other poisons to neonates, newborns and their mothers.

Now , definitive studies of children exposed to AIDS drugs confirm severe DNA damage and the presence of molecular precursors to cancer. Also horrifying are the deadly side effects for pregant women on whom these drugs are forced in countries such as the United States. Some states actually will take the children away from mother if she doesn't cooperate.

If the UNAIDS and the WHO would approach malnutrition, parasites, water treatment, and sanitation systems with the same zeal and vigor in their obsessive-compulsive campaign to promote cutting the penises of grown men, our world would be a much better place.

UNAIDS and WHO both have shown a remarkable ability to bring to nations corrupt health policy and to peddle deadly products and services. Whether it's baby formula instead of breast milk, circumcision instead of STI treatments, AIDS drugs instead of water filtration systems and food, they continue to inflict much pain and unnecessary suffering on the people of our world.

##

Technorati Tags: