It was this past April; the "counselor" said a couple of the bands were still negative on the Western Blot test, but the non-physician decided to say it was a positive.

I learned later, that an analysis of what are acutally shades of gray, is an arbitrary exercise, made by non-physicians. Would I accept a diagnosis of any other fatal condition on such shaky evidentiary criteria?

When I learned how many factors (60) can make the HIV test react positively, I wondered why these evaluations don't consider other reasons for the reactivity. I had recently come off 3 rounds of anti-biotics just within the previous 4 weeks.

I am well, thankfully. My health is fine, and I tell people I don't believe in HIV/AIDS. People think I'm either in denial, or just a bit crazy.

Maybe it's crazy to pump gays, Africans, and pregnant women, with meds that then make them sick and deformed. It is a horrible mistake and too many are falling for it.

I know many people who never did the meds yet who are doing fine 10, 15, 20 years after the HIV positive test, and those who did and do the meds, who have come down with virulent infections, fat redistribution (lipodystrophy), heart attacks and assorted forms of heart disease, kidney and liver failure, and death.

I know someone who because of 4 years on pills containing AZT (i.e., Combivir, Retrovir) had 4 heart attacks. He's scarred heavily from the heart bypass surgeries. Amazingly, he hasn't considered not taking AIDS drugs, and in fact has started a brand new medication, called Fuseon.

How many people went in to the clinics feeling well, and came out thinking they were going to die. Understandably, they latched on to the (misguided) notion that you can fuck with your DNA (HAART= highly active anti-retroviral therapy) at the most basic levels and that would make them better. You start feeling well, and then you take medication to make you better, but then due to the meds many become very sick. Is there a paradox? Or am I just too slow to understand this dismal dilemna HIV positives have to resolve each and every day?

The test used to "diagnose" this condition has a different criteria for each country. How is this possible? It's not possible, but it's happening.

AIDS drugs make many people experience fat redistribution which is not a good thing, others suffer from dysentery that won't go away, and get all sorts of rashes, bone and joint pain, psychosis (dementia), yeast infections, IBS, and high cholesterol. Neutropenia, an abornormally low number of neutrophils, the most common type of white blood cell is another side effect. Ironically, Neutropenia, induced by an "AIDS drug," increases the risk of bacterial and fungal infections; (isn't that what AIDS is, in the first place?)

Those who are lucky enough to survive AZT and some of the protease inhibitors, 10, 15, or 20 years later, are told to think the toxic AIDS "meds" are keeeping them alive.

I personally know quite a few positives who never took the meds, and who are well today, 10 to 20 years after having tested positive for the HIV.

At the same time, it is telling that you don't need HIV to suffer infections. In 1997, the CDC estimated [1] that $5 billion each was spent on non-HIV STDs, and influenza. The CDC also reported "seroepidemiologic studies" thtat indicate "17% to 32% of nonimmunocompromised persons in Virginia, Texas, and Wisconsin, as well as nonimmunocompromised Peace Corps volunteers (before travel), have serologic evidence of Cryptosporidium infection by young adulthood." Firsthand I will tell you: during my 35 years as a negative, I had several of the infections on the "AIDS" list.

Do I have a different perspective because I spent 20 years as an AIDS outsider, a "negative?" Have I become immune to the incantation of a curse that has become almost subliminal? Imagine a haunting Gregorian chant. Close your eyes and try it: "HIV, the virus that (does not) cause AIDS. HIV, the virus that (does not!) cause AIDS." It's easier to resist propaganda when you know that's what's being sold to you.

I don't accept what AIDS lovers tell the world to believe, and I am learning that much of what is, really isn't.

Shamelessly, to sometimes vehement response, I ask "treatment experienced" positives if they ever tried living off the meds, or do they think it's possible, maybe, that they could thrive off of the AIDS drugs? Sadly, most people do not believe in this possiblity, and hence, may never know.

Am I crazy to believe in the power of evolution, in the power of DNA that has millenia of memory and experience in ensuring the survival and propagation of the human race, and of all life.

For all of homo sapiens' grandiosity and towering achievments, our ignorance is obvious: we only are beginning to crack the code of our own genome. It is just this past year that discovery of a new kind of RNA which effectively turns off some "protein factories" that may not be optimal.

How can so many hundreds of thousands of people take these AIDS drugs which affect or destroy vital human processes, while we don't yet understand them. What if HIV was actually a healthy physical reaction to some foreign body in the bloodstream and trying to block the reverse transcriptase is preventing the body from protecting itself?

We are just beginning our journey to knowledge about this code for our lives, yet millions are asked to submit to experimental drugs that interact with DNA and RNA, the very building blocks of these bodies we inhabit on Earth.

I believe in Deepak Chopra's theory, that memory inherent in DNA over millions of years of evolution possesses the power to thrive, endure, and flourish.

This energy for life exists in each individual, in each community of individuals. But, if we assault our physiological systems with weapons of mass destruction, in the form of DNA altering nucleoside and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, protease inhibitors, and all the other AIDS drugs, or if we overuse antibiotics in pills, and soaps, and even bandaids, will we alter the thread of our common future in ways that horrify my inquisitive mind?

I've seen images of babies who are being tested on with potent DNA altering "AIDS medications" who are disfigured with the most grotesque rashes you could imagine, and these images of tubes inserted into 1 to 2 year old New York orphans' belly's to force feed them toxic pharmaceuticals make me shudder.

These crimes are all in an effort to eradicate antibodies which are a natural tool of the human immunity defense, because as many "AIDS dissidents" know, "HIV" has never been purified from anyone, "AIDS patient" or not.

It doesn't make any sense; the more you read, the more questions there are unanswered.

What's scary is that some states will take the children away from parents who do not allow the horrible toxic drugs to be administered to them. With the cumulative loss of our civil rights under the current administration, I fear the time is ripe for force-fed meds, calls for incarceration of folks who "spread HIV," and further typecasting and outcasting of "positives."

The HIV diagnoses come from tests that look for proteins (inner core, fragments of DNA or RNA) and glycoproteins (outer envelope of cells). Twenty-five years ago, Robert Gallo ARBITRARILY (and that's a whole different story!) chose proteins (p) at the molecular weights of 17, 24, 7, and 6 and glycoproteins (gp) at molecular weights of 41 and 160 as determinants of a so-called "HTLV", or later, the "HIV retrovirus." Gallo had a vital interest in the propagation of this belief, and the adoption of widespread testing. Why ? Of course, the answer is always money.

Mr. Gallo continues today to make millions, cumulatively, on HIV tests all over the world. He receives millions to run a lab and as the world knows but for some reason ignores, he is unethical and has 25 years of human anguish, misery, and death on his hands.

These proteins are a 'byproduct' of of 60 or so various factors, including pregnancy. Sadly, the "numbers of HIV cases" in India and Africa are based on samples of...pregnant women. The sample size is then multiplied by an arbitrary number, I think today the number is 43 while it was 7 in the beginning.

In Africa, many people are selling the "AIDS meds" they got for free, to other more fearful "positives" so they can get food.

Bilions of dollars go to "treating" this thing called "HIV" which is probabably just the cellular and molecuular remnants of organic processes. Imagine how many clean water systems, sustainable farms and aqua-culture ponds, and schools could be funded by these billions which of course would help eradicate the real problems of TB, Malaria, and malnutrition (all three of which cause an "HIV test" to show positive.

Its a strange world. My Dad's words come to mind, "The road to hell is paved with good intentions."

July, 2006

Technorati Tags: