NotAIDS! News
March 10, 2007

Did you know that some people test HIV negative after they test positive? Does this mean that in some cases the body will eliminate whatever collection of proteins that Gallo and his followers are calling HIV? Could it mean those proteins aren't viruses but markers of something else, perhaps toxins in the blood?

The most well known case of a "sero-unconverter" is Tommy Morrison, the semi-celebrity boxer forced to retire when he tested HIV positive in 1996, and now, over 10 years later, tests negative.

Tommy Morrison was back in the ring on February 22, 2007, boxing for the first time since 1996 which is when he first tested positive for HIV. He won the match with a KO punch to opponent John Castle at the Mountaineer Race Track and Gaming Resort in Chester, West Virginia. Morrison was cleared by the West Virginia Boxing Commission to fight. He has tested negative several times in the last year and insists he and many others were and are misdiagnosed as HIV positive.

If individuals from different regions of the world test negative years after they test positive, and have several confirming tests on both sides of the timeline, than let us take a brief moment to meditate on how this could be possible given the 'laws of AIDS' as dictated by Gallo, UNAIDS, the HHS/NIH/CDC complex, and most of the media.

There are many proteins the body clears out of the system. Depending on where one lives, and the activities in which one chooses (or not chooses) to participate, those proteins, all other things being equal, will be different between regions, but similar among people of the same region.

The only conculsion a reasonable person could draw is that:

1. the tests are unreasonably unreliable, or
2. some or all of us have a physiology capable of removing the proteins that is said to be "HIV" - the purported cause of AIDS.

Tommy Morrision is not the only case. A Scottish man also tested positive a few years ago, and then three years later tested negative. At the time he made European headlines as a "miracle man" who beat HIV and cleared the "killer virus" from his body. The Scotsman reported on November 14, 2005: "Andrew Stimpson, 25, was diagnosed as HIV-positive in August 2002. However, tests 14 months later showed the virus had completely gone from his body, despite taking no medication to combat it." The report continued, "His doctors are adamant there were no mix-ups with his tests..."

There are many such cases of sero-unconverting that go unreported: HIV test results going from positive to negative, back to positive, and then again negative.

To date, no research study has focused on how the body can naturally clear what is perhaps falsely identified as a killer virus that "is always fatal."

If this is declared to be impossible, then the only other conclusion is that the HIV tests are wildly inaccurate and useless at diagnosing HIV / AIDS. And if that's the case, and a real killer virus is spreading because of inaccurate tests, then the world is really in trouble. The plagues of past centuries will look like a picnic if AIDS lovers have their way.

The more likely scenario isn't that these "sero-unconversions" are miracles on Main Street, but that HIV doesn't cause AIDS, and whatever collection of proteins they say is a deadly, ever-changing mystery virus is not. Because viral infections leave a permanent "signature," then could it be possible that HIV isn't even a virus?

One day there may be an apocalyptic virus or bacteria that nature (or a mad scientist) may unleash, but HIV isn't a a left hook the human immune system can't deal with, and it is apparent that the body can deliver a knockout blow to HIV.

Read more about Tommy Morrison.

Read more about Andrew Sullivan.

Technorati Tags: